American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the HITECH Act

Frequently Asked Questions

I’ve seen lots of numbers out there about the health IT parts of the Stimulus - $19 billion, $23 billion, $36 billion and $38 billion. What is correct?
Originally, it was estimated that $19.2 billion in health IT was included in the American Reinvestment & Recovery Act (commonly referred to as the Stimulus). This was based on $2 billion for the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONCHIT or ONC) and $31 billion for incentives through Medicare and Medicaid; once savings of $12 billion were subtracted out, the net was $19.2 billion.
However, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) now estimates higher projections for incentive bonus payments made to eligible providers that demonstrate a meaningful use of certified EHR technology at $36.3 billion, as well as greater savings for the government based on improved efficiencies, tax revenue and reduced fee schedule payments due to penalties for non-adoption. When you subtract the anticipated savings of $18.8 billion achieved through efficiencies, the CBO estimates a new net cost of $19.5 billion. The total difference between the two totals may seem small, but the total value of the incentive payments at $36 billion is a very noteworthy number.

How does the $19.5 billion that’s allocated to Health IT break down in the Stimulus Bill?
There is $2.1 billion that will be available to the Secretary of Health & Human Services for distribution through the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONCHIT). These funds will be spent on projects related to standards evaluation and development, infrastructure for health information exchange (HIE), grants to states for the purpose of furthering EHR adoption, improvements in telemedicine delivery, and the establishment of Regional Health IT Resource Centers.
There is an additional almost $18 billion to be applied to longer term utilization incentive bonuses for providers meeting certain criteria – this is the net cost after anticipated savings are subtracted from the total spend of $36 billion on incentive payments.

What are the different incentive options?
There are two incentive payment programs outlined under the HITECH Act – one through Medicare and another from Medicaid. Providers can only submit for payment of an incentive bonus from one of the programs so will need to analyze their organization’s public payer mix to determine where they stand to benefit most. Both require that a provider prove “meaningful use” of an EHR product to qualify for the incentives, as well.

How does the bill define adequate EMR utilization? What does “meaningful use” actually mean?
“Meaningful Use” is defined in three ways in the Bill:
−
Use of a certified product complete with ePrescribing capability as determined appropriate by the Secretary of HHS
−
The EHR technology is connected for the electronic exchange of PHI
−
Complies with submission of reports on clinical quality measures

All further details about what type of reporting will need to be submitted, what level of connectivity will be required and the final criteria for standards will be drafted by CMS and approved by the Secretary of Health & Human Services before the utilization incentives begin.

Is this incentive done on a per physician basis or on an office basis?
The incentives in the ambulatory space are paid on a per provider basis.



What types of providers are eligible for the Medicare incentives?
“Eligible professional” is defined as, 1) a doctor of medicine or osteopathy, 2) a doctor of dental surgery or medicine, 3) a doctor of podiatric medicine, 4) a doctor of optometry, 5) a chiropractor.

What are the bonus payments that will be available to physicians under Medicare?
Under Medicare, physicians will be eligible for up to the following amount as soon as they can demonstrate “meaningful use” (beginning in 2011):
Amount They’ll Receive Each Year
Year they first file
2011 18000.00
2012 12,000
2013 8,000
2014 4,000
2015 2,000
2016 0
TOTAL 44,000
Two notes:
• Physicians operating in a "provider shortage area" will be eligible for an incremental increase of 10% in their bonus payments.
• Physicians operating entirely in a hospital environment, such as anesthesiologists, pathologists and ED physicians, are ineligible.

How will the physician payment be calculated under Medicare?
The Medicare payments will be calculated by multiplying the submitted allowable charges to Medicare by 75%, up to the capped amount for the year. So a physician aiming to collect the full incentive payment of $18,000 in 2011 will need to submit allowable charges of at least $24,000. Conversely, a physician submitting only $16,000 in allowables would collect $12,000 in 2011, even though the cap is higher.
As a physician, what if I don’t demonstrate use of an EHR after the incentives are in place?
A physician who did not demonstrate meaningful use in 2014 will have their Medicare fee schedule reduced beginning in 2015. Reductions will be:
•
For 2015, down to 99 percent of the regular fee schedule
•
For 2016, down to 98 percent
•
For 2017 and each subsequent year, down to 97 percent

If the Secretary finds that less than 75% of eligible healthcare professionals are utilizing EHR beginning in 2018, the Secretary can further reduce the fee schedule to 96% and then 95% in subsequent years but not further.

Are “mid-level” providers covered by the incentive programs?
Under the Medicaid program, nurse practitioners and nurse mid-wives can file for incentive payments. Additionally, Physician Assistants (PAs) are included but only insofar as the PA is practicing in a rural health clinic that is led by that PA or is practicing in a Federally qualified health center that is so led. Medical Assistants and Physical Therapists are not included.
Mid-levels are not included in the Medicare portion of the incentives.

Are physical therapists eligible for incentives?
No, physical therapists do not qualify as an eligible professional under either the Medicare or Medicaid incentive program.

Are groups that do Medicare Advantage also eligible for the stimulus dollars?
Yes, there are provisions of the legislation related to groups accepting Medicare Advantage. Those organizations and their providers are eligible for the incentives as long as the provider delivers a minimum of twenty hours a week of patient care services and the organization furnishes at least 80 percent of the services of the individual professional to clients of their organization.
Additionally, it’s important to note that amounts paid by Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) will be close to the amounts paid under Medicare Fee for Service (FFS), but they likely will not be identical. The HITECH Act requires that MAOs make incentive payments “in a similar manner” as under Medicare FFS, but the Act also gives CMS some flexibility in establishing payment formulas.

How do the EHR incentives relate to the ePrescribing and PQRI payments currently available to physicians?
Once a provider starts collecting incentive payments for meaningful use of an EHR (whether in 2011 or beyond), he or she can continue to collect PQRI payments but cannot continue to collect ePrescribing payments.

What are the bonus payments that will be available to physicians under Medicaid?
A healthcare provider is eligible for incentive payments from Medicaid who:
1)
is not hospital-based and has at least 30 percent of the professional’s patient volume coming from Medicaid patients;
2)
who is a pediatrician, who is not hospital-based, and who has at least 20 percent of the patient volume coming from Medicaid patients;
3)
practices predominantly in a FQHC or rural health clinic and has at least 30 percent of the professional’s patient volume coming from Medicaid patients;
4)
is a children’s hospital, or an acute-care hospital that is not described in clause (i) and that has at least 10 percent of the hospital’s patient volume coming from Medicaid patients.

Incentive payments will be based on a calculation that factors the physician’s Medicaid mix in combination with up to $25,000 the first year and $10,000 each subsequent year for five years, all multiplied by 85%. The highest potential for Medicaid payments is $63,750. Additionally, physicians filing under Medicaid must first demonstrate EHR usage by 2015 and will not be eligible for payments after 2021.
Note: Pediatricians, because they have to meet a lower threshold of only 20% Medicaid patients to qualify for the incentives, are only eligible for 66% of the incentive payments described above.

If a physician practice is wholly owned by a hospital, will the physicians receive the incentive payments for meaningful use in 2011, or the hospital as the funding source for the EHR?
This is an area of the law that is slightly ambiguous. Generally, it reads as if this test will be based on the care setting in which a physician furnishes services regardless of the ownership or financial model with a hospital or other provider organization. However, this is an area where further clarification will be sought from the Secretary of HHS.

How can we leverage the recent stimulus bill to make an EHR more affordable for us? How does a rural physician clinic obtain grants for implementing an EHR?
While the majority of the funding in the HITECH Act is reserved for utilization bonuses, part of the $2 billion in discretionary funds to HHS / ONC are to go to grant programs to help organizations offset upfront purchase costs. The details of those grant programs are not yet in place, but it is likely they will prioritize primary care practices, those delivering care in a rural or high Medicaid environment, or those seeking to establish a Medical Home model.

Are the incentives still available if you do not have all medical group offices fully implemented? We have 3 of 30 offices live now.
First, remember that the incentive payments go, for the most part, to the individual physicians delivering the care and are not distributed at the organizational level. However, to earn the payments, the physicians must demonstrate meaningful use, which includes connectivity to other healthcare providers; practices that are not fully operational across the entire enterprise are less likely to have clarified their connectivity strategy and so may present a roadblock to those physicians who are using the EHR. This is among the issues that practices will need to work through in order for their physicians to collect the incentive payments.

PQRI and DOQ have excluded Rural Health Care clinics. Will the new incentives also exclude RHC clinics?
Rural health is a key area of focus in the legislation; many of the formulations of the HITECH Act were so configured specifically to ensure the participation of rural health providers. For example, there is a 10% incremental bonus available to physicians proving meaningful use under the Medicare inventive programs while delivering care in a Health Provider Shortage Area. Additionally, the reporting requirements, while not finalized, are specified to reflect different provider capabilities and will likely not be only code based, as are those in the PQRI program. Instead, the HITECH Act outlines the options of survey and attestation reporting, which could be to the benefit of clinics using 1500 forms.

Do we need to be operating all of 2010 in order to be eligible for 2011 incentive payment?
It is likely the Secretary will determine that funds should be disbursed on a regular and predictable schedule to those demonstrating meaningful use beginning in 2011. For example, if a physician demonstrates use for the first quarter of 2011, a percentage of the utilization incentives will be distributed. We will know the final model once the CMS (and approved by Secretary Sebelius) outlines the ruling for the timing, frequency and reporting requirements.

How will the EHR Stimulus Funding actually come to the physicians?
The timing and distribution methodology for the incentive payments are not yet finalized.

What are the bonus payments that will be available to hospitals under Medicare?
The calculation used to determine the incentive payments to hospitals efficiently utilizing an EHR is much more complicated than that on the physician side.
Essentially, there is a calculation based on a $2 million base payment plus a figure derived from the discharge volume. Then, CMS will additionally determine the hospital’s Medicare share in a fraction form by adding inpatient-bed-days for different Medicare patients (Part A and Part C) (equaling the numerator) over the product of the total inpatient-bed-days and the total hospital charges divided by the total hospital charges (the denominator). Medicare will then pay incentives based on the year in which the hospital demonstrates meaningful use, decreasing the annual incentive payments with time.
Note: Critical Care Hospitals are not eligible for the incentives described above. Instead, they will be allowed to expense the acquisition cost of health it in a single year for Medicare payment instead of depreciating it over a number of years.

How much of the $19.5B will be allocated for ambulatory solutions vs inpatient clinicals, or critical access hospitals vs PPS hospitals?
The Congressional Budget Office has made some predictions about where they believe the utilization will occur, but there are not specific pools of money allocated to the various care settings or any cap set on incentive spending in any one area.

Does use of an EHR in an Emergency Department qualify me as an Emergency Physician for incentive payments?
Hospital-based physicians are not eligible to individually receive incentive payments based on the fact that their organization was the one to shoulder the cost of purchasing and implementing the EHR. This includes specialties such as ED, pathology, anesthesiology and others.

What happens to hospitals that don’t prove meaningful use of an EHR by 2015?
For eligible hospitals not demonstrating meaningful EHR use by 2015, three-quarters of the anticipated percentage increase in the fee schedule shall instead be reduced by 33 1⁄3 percent for fiscal year 2015, 66 2⁄3 percent for fiscal year 2016, and 100 percent for fiscal year 2017 and each subsequent fiscal year. This reduction will be reevaluated each year, and a hospital can return to a normal fee schedule as soon as EHR use is demonstrated.

Are all physicians in the U.S. eligible for incentive bonus payments from Medicare and Medicaid?
While the majority of physicians stand to earn incentive payments if they meet the meaningful use threshold, there are some that will not qualify – those not accepting Medicare, or those that do not have a patient base that is comprised of more than 30% Medicaid patients. Additionally, physicians delivering all care in a hospital, such as anesthesiologists, pathologists or emergency physicians, do not qualify.
Note that while most providers must demonstrate that 30% of their patients are using Medicaid in order to qualify for that portion of the program, pediatricians need only prove 20%. This is an effort to facilitate the participation of more pediatricians in the program who would not normally accept Medicare and very well might not have a sufficient Medicaid volume to qualify.

If the incentives are for Medicare and Medicaid services, how are the providers incited to adopt if they do not have Medicare or Medicaid patients? Those like pediatricians or a practice with a sports medicine specialty?
If a physician does not meet the Medicaid payer mix threshold and does not accept Medicare, they will be able to apply for grants and/or loans to offset the upfront costs of the purchase of an EHR but will not be eligible for incentives as currently delineated. However, the Secretary of HHS will be assessing utilization levels beginning in 2011, and if he or she believes that there is a need to offer other incentives to prompt adoption among those populations of providers, that will be addressed then.

If I meet the definition of meaningful use now as an EHR user, can I earn incentive payments immediately?
No, all organizations must wait until 2011 to submit for incentive payments. However, you do have an immediate opportunity to earn incentives from CMS for ePrescribing utilization, as well as PQRI bonuses.

Can you please outline how this would work in a private psychiatrist’s office? How would they define meaningful use?
Other than the singular Medicaid threshold adjustment for pediatricians, there is no specialty-specific language in the HITECH Act that would mean any criteria changes for any individual type of provider. Therefore, all specialties will need to meet the same criteria: certified EHR product, connectivity to other healthcare professionals, and submission of reports to HHS.



Is this a loan? Will this money have to be paid back if you receive the help for EHR?
With the exception of loan programs which will be established by the States in 2010 based on Stimulus funding from the Federal government, the incentive payments and funding sources identified as “grants” will not be loans or expected to be repaid at any point.

What does the connectivity requirement of the meaningful use definition mean?
CMS, under the guidance of Secretary Sebelius, will be defining this requirement further, but we believe that demonstrating connections and patient data exchange with another provider such as a lab, pharmacy, imaging center, hospital, or other physician will satisfy the requirement. It is possible that as health information exchange initiatives gain traction in more regions across the country that the requirement for connectivity will be adjusted by the Secretary and be interpreted more stringently.

Besides Medicare and Medicaid, how will it work with other large payers?
There is nothing in the Bill that addresses private payers, but it is likely that in this area, as in others historically, the insurance companies will follow the lead of the Federal and State governments.

Are there incentives for providers delivering care in a home care, hospice or other long-term care environment?
There are no incentives in the Stimulus for EHR use in a post-acute setting – the plan is to address this obvious and recognized gap in the larger health reform work that President Obama kicked off in a speech the week of February 23rd. The primary reason for this is that systems for home health, hospice and nursing homes have not been subjected, to date, to the same certification or standards scrutiny as has taken place in the other care settings, so Congress felt more would be required than could be done by the 2011 incentive timeframe.

General Questions
Can hospitals use Stimulus funding for Stark projects?
There is nothing in the Bill that preempts a hospital from moving forward with a program maximizing the relaxation of the Stark and Anti-Kickback laws. Such hospitals may apply for grants and/or loans that become available as the Secretary of HHS allocates the $2 billion and use that money to further EHR adoption in their larger community. The incentive payments for meaningful use will not benefit the hospital as those payments go directly to the practicing providers, but we anticipate that many hospital executives will decide to proceed in an effort to increase physician loyalty and referral dollars.

What do you think will happen in the industry as a result of this? Consolidation? More companies entering the space to get a piece of the pie?
It is likely that smaller, independent players in our space will be acquired as larger companies – and particularly those without any discernible presence in the ambulatory market in particular – seek to gain a share in the incredible opportunity presented by the HITECH Act.

I have a grant request ready to send to HHS – do you know where I should send it?
At this point, the process for grant submission related to Stimulus funds is undefined so it is premature to submit any type of request. The Secretary of HHS Kathleen Sebelius and David Blumenthal, MD, who heads of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONCHIT) will release the plan for allocating the $2 billion by the end of spring / early summer, and at that point, it will be clear where clients can submit requests for grants related to “implementation or planning” as outlined by the law.

Do you know of any tax breaks or incentives (existing or coming in due to the stimulus package)?
A long-standing tax break is the section 179 expense deduction, which was just increased to $250,000; generally, however, we recommend speaking to your accountant or financial advisor about this section of the tax code, as well as any other element that may be advantageous to your organization.

Q: Can the government use the results of this research to tell me, or my doctor, what tests and treatments I can or cannot have?
A: Absolutely not. In fact, the Senate bill specifically prohibits the government from making any coverage decisions based on the reporting or comparative effectiveness research, or even from issuing guidelines that would suggest how to interpret the research results. The sole aim is to disseminate the results of the research to the public, so that patients and their doctors can make the best decisions for their specific situations, together.

How can You make your practice Good to Great?

I have been reading a book written by Jim Collins addressing the CEO and presidents of fortune 500 companies? But I found my way to interpret the finding and correlate in healthcare practice management arena. Surprisingly the business rules are changing so fast that if even the smallest doctor’s office do not coup up with those logics you can be either compromising on results or extinct very soon, with the impact of global economy on every field it is pretty obvious that we cannot ignore the importance of right people at right place? The best phrase in the book which goes in our everyday life running our practice is as follows: it’s not important to motivate and train people , what is required in today’s environment is to pick the right people who are self motivated , trained and skilled who are able to run your business like their own lives.
Most of the doctor’s office unfortunately does not have time to think in that direction that by switching few people in their practice or adding outside consultant they can open a fortune for the practice. They keep beating the same bush again and again which generates same lousy results. After spending 12 years in US Healthcare environment I felt so sad that why the doctors can’t take a bold step and sense the volcano before it explodes. I remember the NPI execution took almost 6 years or more in this country, still I find few doctor and their office system not compatible with NPI guidelines? They are still struggling because they woke up last month when insurance companies start rejecting their claims thus realizing the loss of revenue?
Same thing is happening with the pace of EMR and PQRI where thousands of medical journals and papers are published, Billions of $ have been spent in just to create awareness and hype? Still people are asking each other which Emr is right for me?
I think the best way to reach your financial goals and revamp your practice is to first find out how capable your office managers are if they cannot deliver the results do not wait to fire them until the problem become grave? Most of the Good EMR companies and Billing companies are getting super busy day by day because of the increasing complexities in Billing and coding rules.

Find a right partner who can challenge those rules and fight for your rights like a lawyer to get reimbursement of your services.
Prepare the list of your problems and share it with your consultant?
Hear his solutions or offer?
Compare the offer with 1 or 2 more vendors. See if their solution had ever helped to other similar practice in past.
Move forward do not delay? Remember by delaying this process of change you are losing money every day?

Customers comfort zone?

Since past couple of days i have been taking complete bed rest due to the toe injury, one of the muscle got ruptured. i hope to recover fast as there is no bone found broken in the X-Ray. I was thinking what could make us unique that our clients trust us blindly. The answer i found was that if we continue to provide value to their business and keep our trust within the scope of our services can only keep us within their comfort zone. it is very important to communicate them what we are doing at our side to improve their business. Just to give an example , i will go back 6 years when we started billing business , we were having the sole propriety system which was completely web based and accepting electronic connections through clearinghouse for send the claims electronically and receiving ERA. Now over a period of 6 years we have improved technology far advance and doing several other things which has generated enhanced results for all of our customers. the following evolutions of our software and services processes has not only enhanced 20-25% revenue for our clients but also established us as a masters of revenue cycle management.

2003: Web based medical practice management system with EDI capabilities
2004: Enhanced coding inspector to scrub the claims so that 99% claims go clean to insurance companies to be paid instantly and in one shot.
2005 : Introduced several EMR connectivity options.
2006: Internal CRM program to monitor the productivity of each employee and track the collections status for our clients, that improves secondary billing and tracking of even a smallest volume claim within the system.
2007: launch of full fledged EMR with patient portal and Eprescription facility.
2008: launch of electronic eligibility to verify the coverage within the system automatically.
2009: launch of E prescription faclity using our PMS system without the help of EMR.

We have taken several measures in these 6 years and our team size increases from 2 to 100 people running business for clients in almost 16 states.

in next phase we have launched our anesthesia billing service program in which we are focusing on outpatient surgery centers Anesthesia billing. We have taken a space in India where 400 people can sit and run the operations for complete revenue cycle management.

As our vision clearly focus on improving the health of revenue cycle management in medical practices.
Our goal is 0 Missing claims, 100% charges posting and 100% claim reconciliation.

With this above growth i would like to assure even our smallest volume client one doctor office that the service standards remain same for every client irrespective of their volume and contracts.

happy billing

Kunal Jain

How do practiceforces keep the coding upto date ?

In the days before managed care, billing was a snap. It seemed you could simply look sidewise at a third-party payer and get paid. 

Today, as legalistic coding rules have taken root and payers have gotten stingier, collecting what you’re owed requires fighting a battle on two fronts: the draconian payers on one front — and patients on the other. 

You need the latest tools and tactics just to avoid losing ground in this struggle. You can’t afford to keep doing things “the old way.” Accordingly, Practiceforces has proven tricks on getting the fair reimbursement.

A hit-or-miss approach on staying abreast of coding updates may seem adequate, but it’s probably costing you money time and energy. See how we keep us up to date.

 We Update your codes as and when cms releases the new edition automatically through ingenix in our database, but check with payers before we use them on claims. 

 Claim scrubber inbuilt in our software catch old outdated codes enables billers to revise the codes manually in our system. 

 Update the codes on your encounter forms at the same time. 

 Have a certified coder check your claims once or twice a year, if you don’t employ one in your office.

 Educate doctors and office managers through seminars and training sessions at our office. 

 ensure that 99% claims goes clean from our system to payers so that they can be paid quicker.

 

 

CMS publishes “PQRI: 2007 Reporting Experiences”

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently published an informative document, “Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI): 2007 Reporting Experiences.” It highlights common errors made by both the agency and medical practices participating in the PQRI during the 2007 PQRI reporting period. The issues raised may help practices contemplating participation in the 2009 PQRI.
Additionally, CMS announced modest efforts to review claims submitted for the 2007 PQRI using updated analytics that take into account these unanticipated issues. This review could result in some 2007 PQRI participants receiving adjusted payments and/or additional medical practices qualifying for the incentive payment. However, it is unclear how many providers will be affected. CMS will not make payments based on re-examined 2007 PQRI data until fall 2009.
When the Medical Group Management Association and other national provider organizations met with CMS officials last week regarding this announcement, the agency also provided a chart showing aggregate causes of invalid data submission or reporting.

New CMS rule affects contracted interpretations for diagnostic tests

Beginning on Jan. 1, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will apply a new rule to certain diagnostic tests (excluding clinical diagnostic lab tests) ordered and billed by physicians or their group practices.

In an attempt to curb what it sees as overuse of diagnostic tests and abusive arrangements between providers, CMS has expanded a Medicare billing rule that prevented physicians from marking up the cost of the technical component (TC) of diagnostic tests purchased from an outside supplier (the "purchased diagnostic test rule"). Now referred to as the "anti-markup rule," the new rule will prohibit a billing entity, such as a physician or group practice, from marking up either the professional component (PC) or the TC of a test that was performed by a physician who does not share a practice with the billing entity. The rule will apply when the ordering physician and the billing entity are the same or are related through common ownership or control.

To determine whether the performing physician shares a practice with the billing entity, CMS has devised two tests. Under the first test, the agency will consider a physician to share a practice with the billing entity if the physician furnishes at least 75 percent of his/her services through the billing entity. If this test is met for both the physician performing the PC and the physician supervising the TC (assuming they are not the same physician), the newly expanded anti-markup rule will not apply.

If either physician does not provide 75 percent of his/her services through the billing entity, the anti-markup rule may still not apply if the physician shares a practice with the billing entity under CMS' second test, which focuses on where the test was performed. If the performing physician is an owner, employee or independent contractor of the billing entity and the TC or the PC is performed in the office of the billing supplier, the performing physician will be deemed to share a practice with the billing entity. Importantly, if the billing entity is a physician organization (that is, a physician, a physician practice or a group practice meeting the requirements set forth in the physician self-referral law), the service must be performed in space where the ordering physician provides substantially the full range of patient care services that the ordering physician provides generally.

If neither test is met, payment to the billing entity will be subject to the anti-markup rule. For the part of the service performed by a physician who does not share a practice with the billing entity, the entity will be paid the lowest of:
The performing supplier's net charge to the billing entity;
The billing physician's actual charge; or
The Medicare fee schedule amount for that service.

medicare launches Web-based provider enrollment

CMS rapidly expands access to Web-based provider enrollment system
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) launched the long-awaited Internet-based version of Provider Enrollment, Chain and Ownership System (Internet-based PECOS) for use by individual practitioners in 15 states and the District of Columbia on Dec. 4. Internet-based PECOS is a scenario-driven system that enables practitioners to complete their Medicare provider enrollment application online. By Dec. 15, the agency expanded access to the system to an additional 19 states.
A practitioner will use his/her national provider identifier (NPI) user identification and password to access Internet-based PECOS. Because of this, CMS recommends that individuals reset their user IDs and passwords before accessing Internet-based PECOS, and then resetting them at least once a year. The agency suggests that individual practitioners not share this information with others, including billing services, consultants and practice staff. Instead, CMS expects that individual practitioners will use the system to enroll and/or update their own information.
Currently, Internet-based PECOS is available in the following states and the District of Columbia: Alaska, Idaho, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Kansas, Nevada, South Carolina , connecticut, Kentucky, New Jersey, South Dakota, Delaware, Maryland, New York, Tennessee, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Utah, Hawaii, Minnesota, North Dakota, West Virginia, Illinois, Missouri, Ohio, Wisconsin, Indiana, Montana, Oregon, Wyoming, Iowa

CMS anticipates that Internet-based PECOS will be available to all individual practitioners by the end of January. Stay tuned to mgma.com for information on the system's availability in your state.
After CMS has made the system available to individual practitioners nationwide, it will begin offering it to entities enrolling in the Medicare program.
Access the CMS Web site to learn more about Medicare provider enrollment via PECOS Web.
Access PECOS Web.
For help using PECOS Web, call the CMS External User Services Help Desk toll-free at 866.484.8049 or via e-mail.